From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-04 20:08:43
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:57, Thomas Witt wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> > On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:04, Thomas Witt wrote:
>> >> It was my understanding that we don't ship BBv1 with 1.34.0, but I might
>> >> very well be wrong what's the plan?
>> > I think the plan was to retain V1 for at least one release cycle.
>> The question is whether we can cut corners here. I.e. what's the effort
>> in maintaining and shipping it? If it's neglect-able we might do it.
>> Otherwise I would say don't waste time on it.
>> What do you think effort wise?
> I think it's the question for Rene ;-)
We could "cheat" by replacing the v1 source files with a zipball -- that
wouldn't generate any inspection failures.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk