From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-07 06:06:20
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 12:03, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
> > Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> >> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >>> I suppose lack of "-V2" in the tester id ;-)
> > Strangely that was not the entire reason :-) I also looked at the
> > version number used in the toolsets. For BBv2 they usually contain a
> > ".", whereas for BBv1 the toolsets don't use a period.
> Shouldn't toolset names never contain an extra dot because of limitations
> of some CD-ROM file system? I darkly seem to remember there was once a rule
> about this.
In V2, there's a single toolset file for all possible versions. So, using
version like "7.1" or "4.1" does not mean you have to have a file named
gcc-tools-7.1, and the problem with CD-ROMs is not longer there.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk