From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-08 17:42:07
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 21:42, Rene Rivera wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> on CVS HEAD I observe a few test failures that might be related to your
>>> 'glob for toolset name' patch.
>> Well they are not really related to that patch. They just never passed
>> unless the toolset one passes in matches exactly the toolset name used.
>> Which meant that it basically never matched when using msvc. I.e. it
>> would never match when using an autodetected tool.
> That sounds like bigger problem that it really was. In practice, you don't
> install new versions of compilers every day, so saying
> python test_all.py msvc-8.0
> is quite a reasonable way to test things.
Sure... But by that same rationale you should be perfectly happy in saying:
python test_all.py gcc-4.0.3
Perhaps we should just make the toolset a required argument.
> Isn't this just a matter of saying "specify toolset with version" in docs?
Ah, which docs?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk