From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-17 07:13:44
I'm using two different releases of the Borland compiler which I configured in
user-config.jam as follows:
using borland : 5.6.4 : "C:/Program Files/Borland/CBuilder6/Bin/bcc32" ;
using borland : 5.8.2 : "C:/Program Files/Borland/BDS/4.0/Bin/bcc32" ;
When I build a RC_1_34_0 branch snapshot from this morning with the following
bjam --v2 toolset=borland-5.8.2 stage
libraries are given names which lack the compiler release suffix, e.g.
Am I doing anything wrong or is it a Boost.Build/toolset problem?
I noticed that building with toolset=msvc-8.0 does insert the corresponding
release number in the libraries' names.
Would it be possible to have a three digit suffix used instead of the two digit
one used by BBv1? For some compilers the third digit is significant, not only
Borland's but also gcc.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk