From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-24 19:54:31
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 November 2006 03:28, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> I just tried, in HEAD:
>>> cd boost-root
>>> bjam --v2 -n toolset=gcc --with-thread
>>> I was expecting it to *only* *build* the thread library. Instead, after
>>> complaining that it can't build some targets, it builds and installs the
>>> thread library plus all the headers. Neither "stage" nor "install"
>>> should be implicit in any form. This is not only different from what
>>> BBv1 does, but is also against what an autoconf "make" does which is
>>> what we are trying to model as far as build+install goes.
>> I think one 'explicit' should help ;-)
> Of course :-) But that reminds me...
It more than one 'explicit' ;-)
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk