Re: [Boost-build] darwin.jam vs gcc.jam

From: Deane Yang (deane_yang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-09 15:30:00

David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
 
> What is the difference, please?  They both contain Darwin support.
> Which one is up-to-date?  
> 
> Unless there's a very good reason for a separate toolset, darwin.jam
> should be eliminated.
> 

I hope someone more knowledgeable than me will pipe up. I can only say that
gcc.jam does not work on my Mac (if I remember correctly, it complains that
"-shared" is not a valid option for gcc), but darwin.jam does.

Deane