From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-28 03:18:40
On Thursday 28 December 2006 02:00, Jorge Suit Perez Ronda wrote:
> Hi, to many questions, I'm newbie but I'm also facing you migration
> process. I really like BJAM, it worth moving to it!
> I also have ubuntu but do not use its bjam package, instead I use the
> Nightly build: http://boost.org/boost-build2/boost-build.tar.bz2 , now
> I'm using the source code corresponding to Tue Dec 12 17:36:45 MSK 2006
> which report me:
> Boost.Build V2 (Milestone 11)
> Boost.Jam 03.1.14
> You can learn a lot looking at tools/ utils/ and kernel/ they are the
> perfect complement to the documentation for BJAM which (I think IMHO )
> needs to be improved (at least for a newbie).
FWIW, if you run into anything that needs to be documented better, don't
hesitate to send an email that says so. I can't guarantee immediate reply
but all such email will be "flagged" and considered when I next time get
to work on docs.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk