From: Jeffrey Holle (jeffreyholle_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-29 19:36:52
I've noticed that at least boost.graph graphviz reader/writer library
has been renamed. I assume this is because of a boost universe library
name renaming is desired for consistency.
I've got one gripe and one question:
Some files are name as:
In this case there is redundant information. The boost version is both
in the base name and in the so name. Can't version info be restricted
to just static library names?
Is there a set of variables that will allow an application level Jamfile
to just express the base name of a library? In the above case,
boost_graph boost-graph$(compiler-version)$(multiple threaded)$(debug)?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk