Re: [Boost-build] Improving Boost Build?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-15 16:05:21

John Maddock wrote:

> Irrespective of what happens with the CMake vs BBv2 debate, it's apparent
> that there is still plenty of support for bbv2: indeed, I would echo
> comments that it's a pleasure to use, provided you don't need to dig in
> and write new rules yourself :-)
> 
>
> 2) Better docs.  Yes, I know it's been said before, but we really must get
> the existing toolsets and their options documented.  This need not take
> too long if someone would step up and volunteer to do it.

The part about toolsets is even mostly written:

        http://boost.org/boost-build2/doc/html/bbv2/reference/tools.html

- Volodya