Re: [Boost-build] Why no "--no-undefined" linker flag?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-13 11:05:55

On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:54, eracce wrote:
> I'm wondering why the "-Wl,--no-undefined" flag is not set by default so the
> linker won't allow unresolved symbols from object files when building shared
> libraries.
> Perhaps even "Wl,--no-allow-shlib-undefined" should be used?
> 
> I'm just curious why these flags were not used. I think they are quite
> necessary. Am I missing something?

If those flags are not default in gcc, why they should be default in
Boost.Build? 

- Volodya