From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-01 12:41:42
John Maddock wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>> John Maddock wrote:
>>> Experimenting some more, I see that --toolset=gcc-foobar builds as
>>> well, looks like any suffix can be appended without any error from
>>> bjam - is this really the desired behaviour?
>> That has been previously debated... I can't remember if we came to any
>> conclusion though.
> OK, well at the very least a warning would be helpful, something like:
> "CAUTION: Toolset gcc-foobar does not exist, using toolset gcc instead."
> At least end users would get some idea that somethings up.
The problem isn't that the toolset doesn't exist. It's that "gcc-foobar"
means toolset "gcc" with version "foobar". We are taking the users word
that "foobar" is the version of gcc they have. Here's one thread
discussing the toolset autoconfiguration issue
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk