Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-17 15:12:01

I've found the following line in the output of bjam.

for lack of

It seems that the "<p..> is confusing process_jam_log. So

a) bjam is outputing something it shouldn't
b) process_jam_log isn't handling something it should
c) I'm just missing something.

I could tweak process_jam_log to work around this but if
its a bjam fix, I'd rather the experts look at it.

Thanks for you help.

Robert Ramey

Vladimir Prus wrote:

> I'm not sure I understand what problems will arise from that
> arrangement.
> It seems there are separate defines:
> so everything should be OK.

Well, I made a couple of adjustments and this seems OK now.
Of course I did have some declarations in there for a reason
but maybe some combination was never tests - I'll keep and
eye on it.

> No, it only means that 'exe' projects under Jamfile.v2 won't use
> autolinking. That define does not affect libraries.

That's what I meant to say. Just to be sure, this means
that user programs built with bjam won't use auto-linking
by default. I would expect this is OK since most users
which would benefit from autolinking are probably building
their executables with an IDE anyway.

> - Volodya
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at