From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-18 06:03:58
On Monday 16 July 2007 16:07:15 David Abrahams wrote:
> > On Monday 16 July 2007 06:53:08 David Abrahams wrote:
> >> http://lists.boost.org/boost-build/2007/01/16042.php
> > So, you're saying that
> > msvc.configure 8.0 : "<command>c:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\\VC\\BIN\\amd64\\cl"
> > "<setup>C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\\VC\\vcvarsall.bat" ;
> > got msvc to produce 64 bit binaries for you?
> If that's what the message above says, then yes, that's what I'm saying.
That's too windy logic for me. I'll take it as "it's not confirmed that 64-bit msvc works".
> > As for x86_ia64 vs. x86_ipf -- did you notice #1042 claims "ipf"
> > does not work in practice?
> No I dind't notice.
Ok, somebody commented, unfortunately anonymously, on #1042, saying
that right spelling is x86_ipf, contrary to what msvc docs and your email
claim. In light of which, I've checked in the attached and closed #1042.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk