From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-09 21:46:47
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Martin, do you think it will be OK for you to use
> when invoking bjam, as opposed to setting BOOST_BUILD_PATH?
Martin contacted me on IRC and told me that he can do with BOOST_USER
Since he is very busy at the moment he asked me to forward his answer to
Volodya, is it ok to
1) Revert the latest changes to Jambase and jambase.c
2) Apply my patches to make BOOST_USER variable available?
Roland aka speedsnail
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk