From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-12 01:37:04
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> I've recently running all the boost tests in order to test my library
>> status facilty before checking it in. In the course of doing this
>> I've noticed that
>> in a couple of cases, bjam doesn't create the proper test directory.
>> Here are the tests:
>> a) program_options/test/conver
> Note that a target by this name does not exist. There's 'test_convert'
> target though. That target is 'exe' target, so it's not a 'test',
> formally speaking, therefore no 'test name' is expected in the target
I get a directory
note the absence of test_convert.test.
My reading of process_jam_log.cpp suggests that this is not expected. The
determined to be blank. Is this OK and should I just ignore it? or should
something be done about it. I'm not sure what the point would be if the
results are generated without a corresponding test name. I wonder if in
fact this is what the authors of the Jamfile.v2 intended or it is an
oversight that should be addressed.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk