From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-18 05:00:57
David Abrahams wrote:
> I wouldn't count on everything in the trunk having been maintained.
> You might try copying python.jam from RC_1_34_0
Tried, but no success :-(
Now it chokes on some differences in os.jam.
Comparing trunk with RC_1_34_0 reveals a _lot_ of differences in the
build system anyways.
Since this currently prevents me to run regressions on the trunk, I am
wondering whether it does make sense to run regressions on trunk?
Shouldn't the build system be fixed first?
Please forgive me not having read the long thread about development
policy on main list, isn't trunk still the bleeding edge of boost?
Is there a place where the development plan is published, or will I need
to dig the list to find out?
Thank you for help.
Roland aka speedsnail
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk