From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-14 13:02:48
On Friday 14 September 2007 20:34:21 Boris Gubenko wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >> > Can you please clarify?
> >> Boris,
> >> I still haven't heard anything back from you. Are you planning to
> >> follow up
> >> soon, or should I use my judgement and revert this commit?
> > I would say a week is enough time to comment. I have reverted this
> > addition.
> I have not seen any of these mails, not sure why. I general, I have
> a problem with boost-build list. For one, it does not let me post
What do you mean? You might have to need to subscribe first.
> Now I think I'm not getting all the messages either.
> Fortunately, you've cc-ed me on your mail.
You've CC-ed you on all mails, not just this one.
> The reason for acc_pa_risc.jam' existence is that people running
> regression tests on PA-RISC tried to implement Rene's suggestion in:
> and, for some reason, it did not work. I have not looked at it, but
> I'm not bjam expert, so, I'm not sure if I could be of any help.
And surely, bjam experts cannot help unless they aware that "it did not work".
> Until they/we figure out how to use custom toolset based on acc.jam,
> they'll be using their private copy of acc_pa_risc.jam, which was
> the case before I added it to SVN.
Can you try the attached acc.jam? With it, you should be able to add
using acc : pa_risc ;
in user-config.jam and use:
as toolset name.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk