From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-19 01:40:56
On Friday 19 October 2007 09:17:42 Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> "Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > On Friday 19 October 2007 06:11:14 Rene Rivera wrote:
> >> >>> for consistency, since I run bjam wrapped into script.
> >> >> I guess you could use the "all" target, IIRC.
> >> >
> >> > Nope. both all and test produce:
> >> >
> >> > "don't know how to make ..."
> >> Well the only other alternative I can think of is to add an alias for
> >> the targets.
> > To build all targets in current Jamfile it's possible to do:
> > bjam .
> What if I do not want all targets (there may be potentially some auxiliary
> targets), but only related to unit testing?
What is the practical problem with building those auxiliary targets?
> Why can't we have test target as we used to have?
I don't think so -- it's possible in theory but does not seem like
the most important thing to implement.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk