From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-19 11:32:16
on Fri Oct 19 2007, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost <at> cs.msu.su> writes:
>> > What if I do not want all targets (there may be potentially some auxiliary
>> > targets), but only related to unit testing?
>> What is the practical problem with building those auxiliary targets?
> It maybe test input file generation target that take half an hour to run. In
> any case I just need to run the tests not anything else.
>> > Why can't we have test target as we used to have?
>> I don't think so -- it's possible in theory but does not seem like
>> the most important thing to implement.
> I am sure you have your own priority, but it's important usebiility issie IMO.
I agree, but it's actually pretty easy to achieve. See
which does it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk