|
Boost-Build : |
From: Ilya Sokolov (fal_delivery_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-03 05:01:20
Vladimir Prus пиÑеÑ:
> Ilya Sokolov wrote:
>
>> Cédric Venet wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> (Sorry to create a new thread, but I don't know how to reply to a message
>>> in a digest with outlook...)
>>>
>>>> It was this way before. However Ilya Sokolov told me that
>>>> PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE is wrong -- it tells you what processor you have,
>>>> not what kind of OS you have. And you cannot run 64-bit binaries on
>>>> A 32-bit windows.
>>>>
>>>> According to Ilya, PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER is x86 on win32, whatever the
>>>> actual processor might be.
>>>>
>>>> On win64, PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER is supposed to be always AMD64.
>> Volodya, I told you just the opposite :-)
>
> Err, I re-read your email twice, actually, and still managed to get
> the logic wrong ;-(
>
> What is a bit confusing is that according to Cédric, both
> variables start with x86 on win32 -- is this expected?
No, but it does not matter. PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE is equal to x86 on
32-bit windows and to AMD64 on 64-bit windows.
> I though
> that PROCESSOR_IDENTIFIER would be EM64T anyway.
>
> - Volodya
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk