From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-19 14:59:59
On Dec 19, 2007 3:19 PM, Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Dymanic *and* static lib, as Release, multithreaded, dynamic runtime
> > single build on Unix variants (2 build variants).
> I'd be opposed to this. How many popular projects can you name,
> that build two variants on Linux?
That build two I don't know, but for most libraries one have to
download two packets to develop with it.
gtk+ and gtk+-dev, etc.
I would prefer to have release and debug variants instead of dynamic and static.
But then it seems like an argument to have just one variant.
AFAIK, people usually download boost to develop with it, not as a
binary dependency for some other project.
> - Volodya
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk