From: Johan Nilsson (r.johan.nilsson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-08 02:26:02
Jurko GospodnetiÄ wrote:
> Hi Johan.
>> Thinking out loud:
>> - The dual nature of Jamroot makes it a bit hard to name; perhaps
>> root-project.jam would be an alternative to
>> - Also, what about using project.jam instead of build.jam, as each
>> file-formerly-known-as-Jamfile "is-a" project but does not
>> necessarily define build targets?
> How about:
> Jamfile = project.jam
> Jamroot = project-root.jam
I could live with that. Would be interesting to hear other opinions though.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk