From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-07 03:31:38
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 13:19:28 Jurko GospodnetiÄ wrote:
> Hi Volodya.
> >>>> I'm attaching a patch to fix this so please review and grok it for me
> >>>> to apply or apply it directly.
> >>> It looks like that change introduces a buffer under-run when one passes
> >>> in an empty string.
> >> Yup, you're right. Sorry. Here's a corrected patch.
> >> I tried playing around with the code to get it more succinct but
> >> haven't found a way to avoid that explicitly empty/non-empty if. :-)
> > This patch does not appear to be in yet. Should it be? Rene, any opinion?
> I've had this patch in my sandbox and actively have been actively
> using it on at least two developer machines since I posted it to the
> mailing list an have not had a single problem with it since.
It appears that Rene is more busy than I these days, so I've looked at the
It is OK to commit, thanks you!
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk