From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-14 10:23:19
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Yes --layout=system is closer to what I want.
After having tried to look up debian policy I think I understand what
you are after at.
> Since you've asked, I'd propose one of two things: either (1) change
> the behaviour of layout=system; or (2) for backwards compatibility
> keep layout=system and add a third layout (system-versioned?) that
> does what I suggest.
(1) would be fine I think i.e.
and to have symbolic unversioned link.
However one question about debian policy:
"In most cases, if a package version matches the SONAME, it is a sign
that there is a problem with the versioning scheme."
So, if following your suggestion, would this indicate we introduce a
"problem with the versioning scheme"?
Shouldn't boost libs rather:
and have a unversioned link from
Could you please comment on this?
-- _________________________________________ _ _ | Roland Schwarz |_)(_ | aka. speedsnail | \__) | mailto:roland.schwarz_at_[hidden] ________| http://www.blackspace.at
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk