From: Steve M. Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-20 04:54:12
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 07:14:23AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> From Debian's perspective, the name changes we'd like to see are:
> 1. Remove the compiler name.
> 2. Remove the Boost version name.
In case these statements are percolating in the back of your mind, I'd
like to de-emphasize #2. Removing the Boost version is useful if you
want to have a single version at a time on the system. But I'm coming
around to the idea that multiple Boost development environments is a
useful thing. In that scenario, the current practice of versioning
the link names and the includes directory is exactly right.
On that note, I see that 1.34.1 installs includes into
boost-1_34_1/boost, while 1.35.0 installs into boost-1_35/boost.
Will 1.35.1 still use 1_35 or will it use 1_35_1?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk