Date: 2008-04-23 10:47:38
I have nothing hear from some HP developer. Have you an idea,
when I can expect some answer or idea from them.
"Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:<021c01c8a48c$d60e0980$0300a8c0_at_[hidden]>...
> Hi Markus,
> you remember it correctly. Some change in the Boost code on the trunk unearthed
> latent bug in aC++ compiler. This is why many tests fail on PA-RISC with
> compiler error. PA-RISC developers are aware of this.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <boost-build_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost-build_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Building on HP-UX
> > arno.schaefer_at_[hidden] wrote:
> >> Hi Markus,
> >> sorry, but I didn't find there any results of a build
> >> from a 32 bit compiler for PA-RISC? There is only a 64
> >> bit compiler for probably the intanium architecture listet.
> >> regards
> >> Arno
> > Yes, you're right. The results for HP-UX_pa_risc_aCC are only on the trunk
> > and not on the release report.
> > Boris, I seem to remember that the HP-UX_pa_risc_aCC results on the trunk
> > didn't have so many failures a few weeks ago. Is my mind playing tricks on me?
> > Markus
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk