|
Boost-Build : |
From: ki11roy (andrew.selivanov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-24 06:59:27
Volodya,
It means that ICU library compiled with another version of compiler (gcc in
this case), so it leads to problems with Boost.Regex compilation. I've
solved this by rebuilding of ICU from sources with my current version of
GCC.
WBR,
Andrew
Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have been building boost (up to 1.34.1) for Debian/linux using
>>
>> $(JAM) variant=release,debug threading=single,multi
>>
>> where $(JAM) is the path to bjam (built from the boost sources)
>> together with the options -d2, --user-config and -sHAVE_ICU=1.
>>
>> The user config file contains:
>>
>> using gcc : 4.2 : g++-4.2 : <define>_REENTRANT ;
>> using python : 2.4 : /usr ;
>> using python : 2.5 : /usr ;
>>
>>
>> This always resulted in four static libraries and four
>> shared libraries for, say, the date-time library.
>>
>> With 1.35, however, I get the four shared libs but only one
>> static lib:
>>
>> steve_at_riemann{boost_1_35_0}grep 'gcc.link.dll.*date'
>> ../boost_1.35.0-1_i386.build
>> gcc.link.dll
>> bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.2/release/libboost_date_time-gcc42-1_35.so.1.35.0
>> gcc.link.dll
>>
> bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.2/release/threading-multi/libboost_date_time-gcc42-mt-1_35.so.1.35.0
>> gcc.link.dll
>> bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.2/debug/libboost_date_time-gcc42-d-1_35.so.1.35.0
>> gcc.link.dll
>>
> bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.2/debug/threading-multi/libboost_date_time-gcc42-mt-d-1_35.so.1.35.0
>>
>> steve_at_riemann{boost_1_35_0}grep 'gcc.archive.*date'
>> ../boost_1.35.0-1_i386.build
>> gcc.archive
>>
>> ../../../bin.v2/libs/date_time/build/gcc-4.2/release/link-static/threading-multi/libboost_date_time-gcc42-mt-1_35.a
>>
>> How do I get all 8 library builds back?
>
> Assuming you really want those 8 library variants (just in case -- which
> other libraries
> in Debian build that many?) you can use:
>
> $(JAM) variant=release,debug threading=single,multi
> link=shared,static
>
>> I have read a couple of posts about --build-type=complete, so I tried
>> adding that to $(JAM),
>> but this gives a completely inpenetrable error:
>>
>> Skipping build of: ./headers <build>no in common properties
>> Skipping build of: ./build_all <build>no in common properties
>> Skipping build of: libs/regex/build/icucore <build>no in common
>> properties
>> Skipping build of: libs/regex/build/icuin <build>no in common
>> properties
>> Skipping build of: libs/regex/build/icudata <build>no in common
>> properties
>> /usr/local/src/Packages/boost/upstream/1.35/boost_1_35_0/tools/build/v2/kernel/class.jam:93:
>> in
>> new *** argument error
>> * rule object(searched-lib-target)@2059.__init__ ( name : project :
>> shared ? : search * : action )
>> * called with: ( icudata icui18n icuuc : object(project-target)@212 :
>> true : :
>> object(null-action)@2058 : : : : ) * extra argument icui18n
> .........
>> /usr/local/src/Packages/boost/upstream/1.35/boost_1_35_0/tools/build/v2/kernel/bootstrap.jam:132:
>> in boost-build
>> /usr/local/src/Packages/boost/upstream/1.35/boost_1_35_0/boost-build.jam:11:
>> in
>> module scope make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
>>
>> What does this mean: did I invoke bjam incorrectly or is some jam file
>> broken?
>
> I don't understand what that means, either. Can you provide the output
> with extra --debug-building
> option? Might be that building regex statically got broken somehow.
>
> - Volodya
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>
>
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/help-with-boost-1.35-variant-specification-tp16407914p16849794.html Sent from the Boost - Build mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk