Re: [Boost-build] <install-dependencies>on still broken

From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-16 09:52:55

Dirk Griffioen wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Least year I posted a mail mentioning '<install-dependencies>on being
> broken': bjam (>= 3.1.14) keeps eating memory and cpu - never to return.
> 
> This is still the case with bjam 3.1.16/17 and I really would like to
> use the feature! (Preferably with 3.1.17 as it has the qsort patch).
> 
> I remember it used to work fine, so what happened here?
> 
> Is it bjam that is broke, or is it my use of bjam?
> 
> Are there keywords I should not use, or hints like 'prefer <library>
> over /use'?
> 
> Any hints are welcome ...

You need to provide some more specifics.

- Volodya