|
Boost-Build : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-18 15:11:04
Jurko Gospodnetic' wrote:
> Hi Rene.
>
>> Since I don't enjoy reverting changes when I don't have the time (I'm
>> in the middle of my own product release). And since Boost is nearing
>> the end of a release cycle. *ALL* tool changes are hereby *FROZEN*
>> except for emergency fixes. Any changes must be approved by Beman or
>> myself. And such changes must include making sure Boost testing runs
>> adequately in *both* a Windows platform and a Unix platform. This
>> means going to the boost-root/status directory and running the tests
>> for *at least one* library, but preferably all of them.
>
> Is the release still on schedule and expected to go out after
> 31.07.2008.?
I think we might be delayed 1 week at most. But Beman has a much better
sense of that.
> Just wondering whether to start a new branch for tracking Boost Build
> changes until the release. There seems to be a few people contributing
> patches lately and I do not think we should risk disgruntling them due
> to the code freeze causing their patches not to get processed fast enough.
Either setting up a branch for the continued development would be good.
Or doing a BBv2 release now, and switching the testing and Boost release
to match the BBv2 release, would also work. Volodya would have to decide
if doing a BBv2 release now is a good choice or not. But since library
developers need to use trunk for their individual testing the former is
a more desirable route.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk