From: Jurko Gospodnetiæ (jurko.gospodnetic_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-03 15:35:47
> Johannes is referring to the patch that I proposed earlier this year.
> For the rationale for the (admittedly snarky) name and the need for
> link-incompatibility see:
Thank you for the links.
As for the name - I prefer the ones I suggested so far as they are
more 'neutral' (less spirited/snarky/offensive/...).
And the links do not answer my original link-incompatibility question:
>> * Are we sure we want the <msvc-security-warnings> feature (or
>> <crt-security-theater> as you called it) to be marked as link-incompatible?
>> Doesn't this just enable or disable compiler/linker warnings and does not
>> affect the built executable/object code/library?
I know that the _SCL_SECURE setting (a.k.a. <msvc-checked-iterators>
or <stl-security-theater> the the original post) may cause link
My question was related to the _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS &
_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE settins (a.k.a. <msvc-security-warnings> or
<crt-security-theater> in the original post) which I do not believe
affects link incompatibility in any way but whose feature was declared
as link-incompatible in the original post.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk