Re: [Boost-build] BOOST_MATH_NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH_FUNCTIONS causes build to fail

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] BOOST_MATH_NO_LONG_DOUBLE_MATH_FUNCTIONS causes build to fail
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-11 23:49:44

AMDG

Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> Alternatively, since the test is used to suppress the long double
>> version of the TR1 library, could I patch the build system to avoid
>> building it when a certain parameter is given on the bjam command
>> line?  I can easily arrange for the parameter to be present on the
>> affected architectures.
>>     
>
> OK, after a bit of poking around, I came up with the following hack.
> I'm interested in ideas for improvement.  Could something like this
> make it into Boost itself (minus the ECHOS, of course)?
>
>
> <snip>
>   

Maybe this should be split up in Jamroot so that we can use:
--without-math_tr1l --without-math_c99l?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe