Subject: Re: [Boost-build] default values for free and optional features
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-27 16:09:18
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> Currently, attempts to call set-default with a free or optional
>> feature are silently
>> ignored. The attached patch causes a hard error. Ok to commit?
> What's wrong about setting a default for an optional feature?
It looks like this restriction is left over from before set-default existed,
when there was no way to give an optional feature a default. Of course,
this would kind of defeat the purpose of optional features, since if a
feature has a
default, it will act exactly as though it were not optional.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk