|
Boost-Build : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-build] library naming under Windows 64 bit compiler
From: Mike Jackson (mike.jackson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-29 08:19:45
Sorry, I have been buried in work this week and have not been able to
get back to it. I'll check next week when I get back to the windows
machine at work. Sorry for the delay.
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson mike.jackson_at_[hidden]
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Vladimir Prus<ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 August 2009 Steven Watanabe wrote:
>
>> AMDG
>>
>> Mike Jackson wrote:
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > notice: [cmdline-cfg] Detected command-line request for msvc: toolset=
>> > msvc version=
>> > notice: [cmdline-cfg] toolset msvc not previously configured;
>> > attempting to auto-configure now
>> > notice: will use 'cl.exe' for msvc, condition <toolset>msvc
>> >
>>
>> This ought to be <toolset>msvc-9.0
>>
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > ...patience...
>> > ...found 759 targets...
>> > ...updating 4 targets...
>> > common.copy stage\lib\libboost_thread-vc-mt-gd-1_39.lib
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >
>> > C:\Users\mjackson\Workspace\boost_1_39_0>bjam_x64.exe --debug-configuration --wi
>> > th-thread variant=debug,release link=static runtime-link=shared threading=multi
>> > address-model=64 toolset=msvc > out2.txt
>> >
>> > I can send the entire out.txt file but it is large. This was done on a
>> > freshly unpacked boost 1.39.tar.gz folder. The system is Windows 7 x64
>> > Ultimate with Visual Studio 2008 Standard Edition installed (using
>> > just defaults for the installation).
>> >
>> > I compiled bjam separately for x64 use as the 32 bit version did not
>> > seem to work correctly. This was also done in the "Visual Studio 2008
>> > x64 Win64 Command Prompt".
>> >
>>
>> This looks like a problem with the search in the registry.
>> Boost.Build should be looking at
>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\Setup\VC\ProductDir
>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\\Microsoft\VisualStudio\9.0\Setup\VC\ProductDir
>>
>> Is either one of these correct?
>> If not, what is the correct registry key?
>
> Mike,
> were you able to look at the above registry keys? Do they exist? Do another
> other exist?
>
> Thanks,
> Volodya
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk