Subject: Re: [Boost-build] pathscale pathf77?
From: Spencer E. Olson (olsonse_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-05 13:17:41
On Friday 05 February 2010 04:53:01 Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Thursday 04 February 2010 22:53:13 Spencer E. Olson wrote:
> > Here is the small patch that makes pathf90 be used to compile .f and .F
> > files. Please include it.
> Checked in, thanks.
> I wonder if separate compile.fortran and compile.fortran90 are now still
> necessary. I see that fortran90 has some extra goodies, like serializing
> compilation, or passing the -module option, but maybe this can be always
> - Volodya
Not really sure. I thought the same thing when I was submitting that patch.
I just don't know the consequences of using the fortran90 compile line. I
don't have too much Fortran code, and even less Fortran90 as of yet, but I do
need it supported similarly between several compilers. Perhaps Noel can
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk