Re: [Boost-build] Named metatarget parameters

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Named metatarget parameters
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-11 08:43:00

Johan Nilsson wrote:
> ... but looks even messier. Perhaps the first one (i.e. example after 
> the "Why not:" above) would be a reasonable candidate?

I'm afraid that the whole "arg-type: value1 value2" is not going to work 
from a language parsing point of view because of:

exe e : e.cpp :
   my-option: What's that:
   another-option: <fubar>2
;

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail