Subject: Re: [Boost-build] bjam 4.0.. in C++
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-14 14:16:45
Philipp Thomas wrote:
> * Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden]) [20100522 19:58]:
>> But even if we do end up using compiled-libs they would be directly
>> statically compiled in anyway as using the BBv2 build files for the would
>> be out of the question.
> Sorry for jumping in late. I just wanted to remind you that you shouldn't
> depend on static libs being built. We at Novell/SuSE for instance don't
> build/distribute them at all.
I think the idea is that bjam wouldn't use a static or shared
library at all. The sources would just be compiled into bjam.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk