Boost logo

Boost-Build :

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] 'bjam -q' and configuration checks
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-26 11:31:55


Daniel James wrote:
> When I try to run the iostreams tests with 'bjam -q' they don't run
> (they run fine without the '-q' flag). I think it's because the
> 'has_icu' configuration check (in 'libs/regex/build/Jamfile.v2')
> failed (since I don't have icu) and '-q' causes bjam to stop at that
> point. I'm using '-q' because I want it to stop at a compiler error or
> failed test, the configuration failure isn't a problem for me. Would
> it be possible to continue after failed configuration checks, or maybe
> for regex to flag a configuration failure as okay?

I think it's supposed to work this way. Unfortunately, the ignore-minus-n
switch doesn't seem to quite work.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at