Subject: Re: [Boost-build] 'bjam -q' and configuration checks
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-27 12:36:55
On 26 June 2010 17:06, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the problem. I'm not sure whether
> it's better to combine the options for blocking -n and -q, or
> make them separate.
Seems fine with the patch.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk