Subject: Re: [Boost-build] 'bjam -q' and configuration checks
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-28 11:10:40
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Saturday 26 June 2010 20:06:12 Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes the problem. I'm not sure whether
>> it's better to combine the options for blocking -n and -q, or
>> make them separate.
> Thanks, the patch seems fine to me. I am not sure about combining the
> options either -- but it's not very important anyway, since nobody
> should use the builtin directly.
Well, the main disadvantage of using separate options that
I see is that it will force anyone using trunk bjam to rebuild.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk