Subject: Re: [Boost-build] 'bjam -q' and configuration checks
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-12 02:55:22
On Monday 28 June 2010 19:10:40 Steven Watanabe wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 June 2010 20:06:12 Steven Watanabe wrote:
> >> The attached patch fixes the problem. I'm not sure whether
> >> it's better to combine the options for blocking -n and -q, or
> >> make them separate.
> > Thanks, the patch seems fine to me. I am not sure about combining the
> > options either -- but it's not very important anyway, since nobody
> > should use the builtin directly.
> Well, the main disadvantage of using separate options that
> I see is that it will force anyone using trunk bjam to rebuild.
Ah, you're right. Well, then a single option is somewhat better.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk