Boost logo

Boost-Build :

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] [python] Python build description
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 12:06:17

On Tuesday 13 July 2010 23:40:55 you wrote:

> While the immediate point of the Python port and my sabbatical is to
> get Boost.Build internals converted to Python, while keeping Jam
> languange allowed to build description, it is becoming apparent that:
> - For complex build tasks, Python might be better. In particular,
> it's almost impossible to allow Jam modules to extend classes defined
> in Python, so any code that defines custom generator classes has
> to be Python
> - It's awkward to have build description split over two files in
> different language
> So, it seems reasonable to permit build description entirely in Python.
> Like, if you have 'Jamfile', it's in Jam language, and if you have
> '', it's Python.

In addition to using '' as replacement for Jamfile, does it seem
OK to use '' as replacement for Jamroot?


Vladimir Prus

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at