Subject: Re: [Boost-build] 'bjam -q' and configuration checks
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-17 12:35:44
On Monday 12 July 2010 10:55:22 Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Monday 28 June 2010 19:10:40 Steven Watanabe wrote:
> > AMDG
> > Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > > On Saturday 26 June 2010 20:06:12 Steven Watanabe wrote:
> > >
> > >> The attached patch fixes the problem. I'm not sure whether
> > >> it's better to combine the options for blocking -n and -q, or
> > >> make them separate.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Thanks, the patch seems fine to me. I am not sure about combining the
> > > options either -- but it's not very important anyway, since nobody
> > > should use the builtin directly.
> > >
> > Well, the main disadvantage of using separate options that
> > I see is that it will force anyone using trunk bjam to rebuild.
> Ah, you're right. Well, then a single option is somewhat better.
Somebody was hit but this bug when building 1.44. Steven, are you going
to commit the patch, and shall I?
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk