Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Bjam patch to use maximum value of timeout option
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-22 14:29:05
On Monday, November 22, 2010 22:07:13 K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
> I discovered that if bjam is presented with more than one occurrence
> of the timeout parameter (-l) on the command line, bjam will always
> use the first occurrence. Often during regression testing, more than
> one -l option occurs on the command line. This patch changes the
> logic to use the largest specified timeout value on the command line,
> rather than an order specific selection (i.e. always first, always
> last, etc...).
> Tested on Darwin and Linux, okay to commit?
Looks fine to me.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk