Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Bjam patch to use maximum value of timeout option
From: K. Noel Belcourt (kbelco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-23 16:33:31
On Nov 23, 2010, at 1:41 PM, K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:35 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
>> At Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:07:13 -0700,
>> K. Noel Belcourt wrote:
>>> I discovered that if bjam is presented with more than one occurrence
>>> of the timeout parameter (-l) on the command line, bjam will always
>>> use the first occurrence. Often during regression testing, more
>>> one -l option occurs on the command line. This patch changes the
>>> logic to use the largest specified timeout value on the command
>>> rather than an order specific selection (i.e. always first, always
>>> last, etc...).
>>> Tested on Darwin and Linux, okay to commit?
>> Needs a doc patch too, no?
> Yes, I think so. Working on that.
Okay, sorry to be uninformed but how do I update the bjam
documentation (presumably it's what's shown on this page)?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk