Re: [Boost-build] [EXTERNAL] Major engine changes

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] [EXTERNAL] Major engine changes
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-03 14:04:17

AMDG

On 12/03/2011 10:43 AM, Belcourt, K. Noel wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> 
>> I've just committed a major rewrite of the
>> jam interpreter. So, far, I'm seeing a 2x speed
>> up running bjam -n -d0 in $BOOST_ROOT/status.
>> I've tried to test my changes thoroughly, but, as
>> always, there may be something that I missed.
>> If anything breaks, please let me know, and I'll
>> try to deal with it ASAP.
> 
> It looks as if big endian (SunOS and AIX) bjam is segfaulting.  I
> haven't had time yet to debug this but I noticed a few new warnings.
> 

Is it okay with r75545? This introduced some endian-dependant
code, but I thought I was careful.

> "function.c", line 376: warning: implicit function declaration:
> backtrace_line
> "function.c", line 378: warning: implicit function declaration: backtrace
> "function.c", line 2685: warning: implicit function declaration: glob
> "jam.c", line 622: warning: implicit function declaration: pwd_done
> 

Bother.  I think these are innocuous, though.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe