Subject: Re: [Boost-build] What needs fixing for MinGW
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-01 15:20:17
On boost.build level, Cygwin is separate value of target-os feature, so if filesystem treats its identically to windows this is probably problem with filesystem library. On the other hand, I don't really know what percentage of users actually care about Cygwin these days and why.
On 01.05.2012, at 23:05, FrÃ©dÃ©ric Bron <frederic.bron_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> For quite a while, we had users complaining about Boost.Build operation in
>> Windows with MinGW.
> is cygwin part of this topic?
> because cygwin is broken for a long time now because it is considered
> that cygwin=windows but it should be cygwin=posix. In particular,
> filesystem does not work well. With V2 it was possible to manually
> configure with macro definitions but not with V3 (POSIX_PATH,
> But all this is not mingw so I fair it is not in the scope of your message.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk