Subject: Re: [Boost-build] BUMPITTY BUMP: [git] genrating forward headers
From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-13 16:45:51
On 09/13/2013 02:42 AM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 12:58 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> On 12.09.2013 23:32, Bjørn Roald wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2013 05:07 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>>> Which targets on 'status' fail to build headers? I think adding implicit
>>>> dependency to status/Jamfile.v2 shall work.
>>> Steven also was of the opinion that this should work in some earlier
>>> post. I also had this working and was surprised it did not at some
>>> testing just prior to posting this. So I added the note. Maybe I had
>>> mixed up my mental notes here, or there where some finger trouble
>>> involved. I will re-check this and see if it is OK.
>> Right now, status/Jamfile.v2 does *not* have implicit dependency on
>> headers, but with that added, it should work I think. If you could
>> verify that, it would be great.
> That shouldn't make a difference. status/Jamfile.v2
> is just a bunch of alias targets. The real targets
> are under libs/
Right, adding implicit-dependency in status/Jamfile.v2 like this:
: source-location $(BOOST_ROOT)
: requirements <hardcode-dll-paths>true
does not make any difference in my tests.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk