Subject: Re: [Boost-build] modular builds
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-04 23:22:08
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Stefan Seefeld <stefan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 04/05/15 12:55 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> > I'm trying to decipher what your goals are. Since I can't see what use
> > case you are trying to solve. Are you:
> > 1. Trying to support building BPL against an external system provided
> > regular Boost install?
> > 2. Support building BPL with a full Boost tree checkout?
> > 3. Users building their apps with BPL already built and installed?
> > 4. Something else?
> I'm trying to do 1), i.e. assume a development platform with Boost
> libraries preinstalled, then check out and work on boost.python,
> building it against the system libs only.
OK, got it. And the modular BB support I wrote will not immediately help
you. As this is not the use case I had. But it is a use case I want to
support eventually. If you haven't already, you should look at the BB
built-in external Boost lib support <
haven't used it so I can't claim any suitability. But it does implement the
tagging search for built libs part.
Anyway.. I can try and help in your efforts on getting BPL built this way.
So to answer your earlier questions.. The direction to take is something
like that boost.jam support. I.e. to refactor the parts of boostcpp.jam
that could be hoisted into BB/contrib and then they could be used without
duplication. Of course it's harder to come up with a nice interface for
such things :-)
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk