Subject: Re: [Boost-build] address-model as build requirement broken?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-19 14:43:02
On 08-Aug-15 3:25 PM, John Maddock wrote:
> There seems to be a recent(?) change to boost.build that means adding <address-model> as a build requirement is now broken.
> I have an existing Jamfile that basically builds the same program with a bunch of different compiler options and
> compares the results (see https://github.com/boostorg/math/blob/accuracy/reporting/performance/Jamfile.v2), this used to
> work fine, but now I get:
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\feature.jam:782: in expand-composites from module feature
> error: explicitly-specified values of non-free feature <address-model> conflict
> error: existing values: 64 32
> error: value from expanding <deduced-address-model>32 : 32
I can reproduce this with 'accuracy' branch of Boost.Math.
> To reproduce just add:
> as a build requirement to any otherwise trivial project and try and build with msvc.
That did reproduce the problem for me, i.e.:
exe first : first.cpp : <toolset>msvc:<address-model>64 ;
works for me, with msvc.
I'll take a closer look at Boost.Math.
Sorry for delay,
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk