Subject: [Boost-build] FW: [Boost-users] Building Boost 1.60 with VS2015 - 32 bit compiler is always selected
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-01 08:01:26
Iâve cross posted to the Boost Build list in case someone expert there is not following the main list.
PS I vaguely think I may have been confused by this in the past too.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830 From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Tiago Gehring Sent: 01 February 2016 08:53 To: boost-users_at_[hidden] Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building Boost 1.60 with VS2015 - 32 bit compiler is always selected Hi, Thanks for the replies. You are right, I did a rebuild of boost passing now the architecture=x86 parameter (I think that I left it out the first time - I think that I saw somewhere that this has to be explicitly specified) and the code generated is definitely 64-bit (although it still shows "32-bit: yes" during the build). Thanks again, Tiago On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 at 06:24 Roger Leigh <rleigh_at_[hidden]> wrote: On 01/02/2016 08:02, Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, > > I am compiling with Visual Studio 2013 with a similar command line, and > it is true that I get the same strange "32 bits: yes". But after that, I > am linking against a 64bits application, and it works fine. Maybe this > is merely a bug in the b2 output ? I've seen this with earlier Boost releases as well with VS2013; I don't think it's a Boost 1.60 issue specifically. Regards, Roger _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users_at_[hidden] http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk